top of page

The Loss Leader on the Plate: How Hospitality Learned to Sell Something Else

  • Guest Contributor
  • 11 hours ago
  • 4 min read
half eaten burger above a travel writer's desk

 

Image by rawpixel.com on Magnific 

The cheapest steak I have ever eaten cost four dollars and ninety-five cents, arrived at two in the morning, and was not really a steak. It was a device. Somebody had calculated, quite precisely, how long a four-dollar steak would keep a person inside a building, and what that person was likely to do while they were there.

This is not a story about bad food. It is a story about what happens to a plate of food when it is asked to sell something other than itself, and it explains rather a lot about why the food in front of you costs what it costs.

The Meal That Is Not the Product

The loss leader is the oldest trick in retail and the least understood by the people it is worked on.

A supermarket sells a rotisserie chicken below cost, positions it at the back of the shop, and recovers the difference across the aisles you walk through to reach it. A cinema shows the film at close to no margin, because in the opening weeks the distributor takes most of the ticket, and then sells you popcorn at a markup that would embarrass a jeweller. A pub sets its food prices to keep you at the table, because the table is where you order the second bottle.

In each case the item you believe you are buying is the bait, and the item you are actually buying is somewhere else on the receipt. The kitchen is not a profit centre. It is a duration device, engineered to hold you in place.

What a Free Buffet Was Actually Buying

Las Vegas took this logic further than anyone and did the arithmetic openly.

The buffet was not generous. It was priced to be forgettable, and the rooms were priced below cost, and the drinks arrived without being ordered, because every one of those subsidies was purchasing the same commodity: time on the floor. A guest who left the building to find dinner might not come back. A guest who ate badly for six dollars and stayed was worth considerably more than the twenty dollars the meal had cost to produce.

There is no online equivalent, and it is worth being precise about why. Nothing of this kind attaches to Mrq UK or to any other operator licensed by the Gambling Commission. There is no dining room, no kitchen, nobody circulating with a tray. There is nothing to comp, because there is nothing to leave. The whole apparatus of subsidised hospitality existed to solve a problem that a telephone does not have.

Which means, incidentally, that if you have ever wondered where the free buffet went, part of the answer is that it stopped being necessary.

The Great Inversion

Here is the part that surprises people, and it is well documented in the revenue statistics the Nevada Gaming Control Board has been publishing for decades.

Somewhere in the 1990s the ratio flipped. Non-gaming revenue on the Strip overtook gaming revenue, and it has never gone back. Rooms, restaurants, shows and retail became the business. The floor became an amenity attached to a hotel, rather than a hotel attached to a floor.

The consequence for food was immediate and dramatic. The moment a restaurant was expected to earn its own keep, it stopped being a duration device and became a restaurant. Serious chefs arrived, because for the first time there was a reason to pay them. The food in Las Vegas became genuinely good at precisely the moment it stopped being free.

That is not a coincidence. It is the whole mechanism, running in reverse.

The Pub, the Cinema, the Airline

Look for the inversion elsewhere and you find it everywhere.

Airline meals were dreadful for as long as they were included in the fare, which is to say for as long as they were a cost to be minimised rather than a product to be sold. Then carriers unbundled, began charging separately, and the food improved, not because anyone became more generous but because a thing you pay for separately must justify itself separately.

British pub food followed the same arc. For thirty years it existed to slow your drinking, and it tasted like it. Then beer margins compressed, food became the profit centre rather than the bait, and the gastropub arrived. Everyone complained about the prices and everyone ate better.

The cinema is the last holdout, and the popcorn remains what it has always been, which is the actual product.

Why the Food Got Better

There is a general principle buried in all this, and it is useful to a diner.

Food that is subsidised by something else will be exactly as good as it needs to be to keep you where you are, and no better. Food that must pay its own way will be as good as the market for it demands. If you want to know whether a kitchen is trying, work out what the building is actually selling.

The corollary is more cheerful than it sounds. Almost everywhere, over the last thirty years, food has stopped being the bait and started being the point. The hotel makes its money on the restaurant. The pub makes its money on the plate. The casino floor turned out to be the amenity all along.

The four-dollar steak has gone, and I do not miss it. I do, occasionally, admire the arithmetic.

bottom of page